Needless to say, the Boston Globe would not publish, let alone respond to, the following cartoon and counter essay, regarding one of its own, columnist Jeff Jacoby. After all, it broke a cardinal rule: Thou shalt NOT criticize the journalists...
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................
Trolls Here, Trolls There, Trolls Everywhere!
Career Columnists vs. We, the People, uh, Trolls
Thou shalt not bite the hands that feed constitutes the fundamental problem confronting newspaper columnists, or any other so-called professionals, for that matter. In the case of Jeff Jacoby, Boston Globe columnist, criticism of the Boston Globe, its editor, and, of course, other columnists constitutes that taboo. For example, Jacoby will certainly not write a column decrying the egregious anti-white racist writing of his fellow columnist, Renee Graham. And sadly, his silence serves, like it or not, to support the black good/white bad narrative pushed by the latter. Over the years, I’ve submitted a number of highly critical op-eds, including several critical of Graham’s blatant racism (see Black Racists with Press Badges” and “Racism, Racism, Racism Ad Nauseam, Ad Infinitum, Ad Obscurum") to the Globe, all of which were categorically rejected. After all, I, plebe, uh, troll, have no voice.
The idea of career columnists, who end up forming an elite group, is a bad one, because it demands one voice over and over each week, as opposed to different citizen, uh, troll voices. It requires the career columnist to come up with something each week for his or her weekly column… and in the absence of a good idea, fluff is always a viable option. And indeed Jacoby’s latest column is a good example of the latter, “Column-writing in the Internet age is much better. And much worse." Sure, there’s the opportunity of plebe letters to the editor, but that venue demands very short critiques. Also, there’s the opportunity of a guest editorial, but that demands the approval of the editor. Try getting an op-ed critical of an editor published in the editor’s newspaper!
“I have made a living writing opinion commentary for mainstream newspapers since the 1980s,” notes Jacoby in his column. In essence, that constitutes the very crux of the career columnist quandary because “making a living” (career) inevitably must conflict with truth telling. Career is the crux of the professor problem, the politician problem, the lawyer problem, the journalist problem, the poet problem, and on and on. Career vs. truth! As a former professor, I was able to experience that problem first hand. But unlike most, I chose truth over career. In fact, I was fired from my last teaching job at American Public University because I disobeyed a direct order from my bosses to cease expressing my point of view regarding criticism lodged against me. How many newspaper columnists would choose truth over career? Likely, very, very few… because money (and collegiality), for most professionals, always tends to trump truth. Would Jacoby and other careerists be able to fully comprehend that quandary? Have they ever even contemplated it? Self-satisfaction (ego), of course, demands a failure to comprehend. For those incapable of understanding, Solzhenitsyn’s powerful essay, “Live Not by Lies,” ought to be required reading.
Jacoby does not, of course, address in his column the questions I address here. What he does, instead, is address a more or less superficial issue: writing columns in the age of the internet. “I leave it to others to sketch the view of the digital landscape from 30,000 feet,” he notes. “Here’s what it looks like at ground level to one guy who has been in the opinion business since the era when opinions were crafted on typewriters.” Well, opinions should not be crafted on typewriters… or computers, but rather in the mind and with TRUTH and FACTS always as the editor, not the BOSS as the editor.
Careerists always cave. Truth-tellers do not; they fight vigorously against the vague orthodoxy that tries always to get them to cave/to conform/to be collegial. Jacoby cites an example, though to simply support his superficial account of the wonders of the internet, “In a 2012 column about vulgarity, I referred to a cable program that used the F-word 38 times in a four minutes. I wasn’t about to quote the scene—but I could supply a link to a video clip.” Why does Jacoby write the F-word? Why is that less vulgar than “fuck”? For me, the two are the same, though evidently the former contains a touch of cowardly conformity and superficial politesse. Careerists embrace word control. Truth-tellers fight against it. “Vulgar” is a subjective determination, made by faceless cultural apparatchiks and educrats, in an effort to control vocabulary and opinion, and deflect from truth.
Careerists always cave. Truth-tellers do not; they fight vigorously against the vague orthodoxy that tries always to get them to cave/to conform/to be collegial. Jacoby cites an example, though to simply support his superficial account of the wonders of the internet, “In a 2012 column about vulgarity, I referred to a cable program that used the F-word 38 times in a four minutes. I wasn’t about to quote the scene—but I could supply a link to a video clip.” Why does Jacoby write the F-word? Why is that less vulgar than “fuck”? For me, the two are the same, though evidently the former contains a touch of cowardly conformity and superficial politesse. Careerists embrace word control. Truth-tellers fight against it. “Vulgar” is a subjective determination, made by faceless cultural apparatchiks and educrats, in an effort to control vocabulary and opinion, and deflect from truth.
Jacoby laments, “And while the extraordinary vistas opened up by the Web have made the job of a columnist so much more efficient and rewarding, the new norms of online culture are sour, angry, and tense.” But “sour, angry, and tense” are simply epithets used to kill the messenger in an effort to deflect from truth, be it sour truth, angry truth, or tense truth. The terms are used to denigrate truth or opinion, which the denigrator does not like and cannot, or fails to, challenge via reason and fact. For me, I’d rather speak the “vicious” truth, than receive an award like Jacoby: the Breindel Award for Excellence in Opinion Journalism… or rather for Excellence in Turning a Blind Eye Regarding Bias Journalism!
Jacoby laments, “the marketplace of ideas seems always at the point of exploding. The nastiness of social media, the bile of online comment sections, the viciousness of trolls—all are only too familiar. It is impossible to write these days without being aware of the online mob ready to pounce.” Well, I surely must be part of that “online mob” because, well, I am a plebe, uh, troll, whereas Jacoby is an elite prize-winning journalist. Unlike him, I openly express, for example, my full disgust against the platform provided by the Globe to egregious racists like Renee Graham.
Elite career columnists, journalists and newspaper editors have grown thinner and thinner skin over the years just like academics and poets. They cannot bear criticism. How easy it has become for them and other establishment cogs to reject hard-core criticism with simple phrases like “go away troll” (poet Eileen Myles—see “Dyke Poet, Smyke Poet, Who Gives a Damn!”) or “the shrillness of your rants” (editor Chris Busa, Provincetown Art—See “BULLSEYE”). In essence, just call the writer of unwanted criticism—no matter how factual and logical—a “troll.” Jacoby’s entire essay is an anti-alt-opinion screed against so-called “trolls.” He laments, “Too many readers have no interest in absorbing a column’s argument or weighing its merits. They read instead to validate beliefs they already hold. They desire not to better understand ideas they oppose, but to see those ideas denounced, refuted, and mocked.”
Why has it become so difficult for columnists like Jacoby and Graham to brook, let alone encourage, alt-opinions? That’s the real problem, not trolls! As editor of a small literary journal, I always encourage and publish the harshest criticism lodged against me and the journal. What’s the big deal? Well, apparently, that is a big deal! Jacoby concludes, ever lamenting, as if somehow he were forced to read comments about his columns: “Opinion columns aren’t tweets, but we live now in a culture that conducts far more of its political conversation on social media than on op-ed pages. The norms of that culture have adjusted accordingly. The results haven’t been pretty. Just ask a columnist.”
Well, if you can’t take the heat, get the hell out of the limelight, dear well-paid elite columnists! Now, do you think the Globe and its editor, Brian McGrory, who I dared satirize in a cartoon, “The Journalists—Racism Here, Racism There, Racism Everywhere,” a year ago, will publish this counter opinion? In fact, that summarizes the very crux of the Boston Globe problem, the one Jacoby will never address in a column…
No comments:
Post a Comment