A Forum for Vigorous Debate, Cornerstone of Democracy

***********************************************************************************************************************************
A FORUM FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND VIGOROUS DEBATE, CORNERSTONES OF DEMOCRACY
[For the journal--guidelines, focus, etc.--go to www.theamericandissident.org. If you have questions, please contact me at todslone@hotmail.com. Comments are NOT moderated (i.e., CENSORED)!]
Encouraged censorship and self-censorship seem to have become popular in America today. Those who censor others, not just self, tend to favor the term "moderate," as opposed to "censor" and "moderation" to "censorship." But that doesn't change what they do. They still act as Little Caesars or Big Brother protectors of the thin-skinned. Democracy, however, demands a tough populace, not so easily offended. On this blog, and to buck the trend of censorship, banning, and ostracizing, comments are NEVER "moderated." Rarely (almost NEVER) do the targets of these blog entries respond in an effort to defend themselves with cogent counter-argumentation. This blog is testimony to how little academics, poets, critics, newspaper editors, cartoonists, political hacks, cultural council apparatchiks, librarians et al appreciate VIGOROUS DEBATE, cornerstone of democracy. Clearly, far too many of them could likely prosper just fine in places like communist China and Cuba or Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Russia, not to mention Sweden, England, and Austria.
ISSUE #47 PUBLISHED MAY 2024. NOW SEEKING SUBMISSIONS FOR ISSUE #48.

More P. Maudit cartoons (and essays) at Global Free Press: http://www.globalfreepress.org

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Anne Brennan Cape Cod Times

The following brief essay was sent in 2021 to the Cape Cod Times as an alt-opinion.  No response was ever received.  

.........................................................


From: George Slone <todslone@hotmail.com>

Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 8:14 AM

To: abrennan@capecodonline.com <abrennan@capecodonline.com>

Cc: Lawrence Brown <columnresponse@gmail.com>; Brent Harold <kinnacum@gmail.com>; jade.francis@capecod.edu <jade.francis@capecod.edu>; alexandria.zine@capecod.edu <alexandria.zine@capecod.edu>; seachange@capecod.edu <seachange@capecod.edu>; info@sturgislibrary.org <info@sturgislibrary.org>

Subject: The Great Diversity Delusion/Diversion

 

To the Cape Cod Times,

Please publish the following op-ed.  Thank you!

Au plaisir,

G. Tod Slone

Barnstable, MA


The Great Diversity Delusion/Diversion

Diversity is a political ideology.  It has proven time and again to be a veritable plague on reason and truth. Proponents of the diversity ideology tend to be hypocrites and anti-white racists.  They tend to be as unoriginal as it gets and as unquestioning and unchallenging as it gets.  Sadly, the top priority for Anne Brennan, new editor of the Gannon corporate-media-controlled Cape Cod Times is… diversity.  

          How to rise to the power-position of a newspaper editor?  Well, just follow the prime rules for how to be a loyal lackey.  Rule #1:  do not make waves.  Rule #2:  do not buck the system.  Rule #3:  do not go against the grain.  The same rules, of course, apply to how to become a favored newspaper columnist or tenured professor.  And so society ends up not with courageous, truth-telling individuals, but rather with in-lockstep conformists, the kind the local chambers of commerce adore.  Money rules and always has ruled.  Money controls the press, certainly not truth.  

          Brennan boasts:  “Last year, I shared my plans to increase the inclusivity of our coverage and to diversify our newsroom staff so that Cape Cod Times reporters, editors and photographers mirror the demographics of the Cape’s population by 2025.”  She does not at all mention striving towards unbiased, rude-truth reporting as a goal and covering stories that her bosses might not like, nor does she mention providing a platform for all those on Cape Cod!  Gannon, as well as Paul Pronovost, her predecessor, refused to publish, let alone respond to, any criticism I sent with their regard (see, for example: wwwtheamericandissidentorg.blogspot.com/2021/01/anne-brennan.html, wwwtheamericandissidentorg.blogspot.com/search?q=Cape+cod+times, and wwwtheamericandissidentorg.blogspot.com/2015/05/paul-pronovost-and-noah-hoffenberg.html).  

          In fact, I have yet to see any criticism at all regarding those editors, published in their newspaper.  Both refused to even publish the fact that I, a local writer, had been permanently banned from my local library, Sturgis Library, without warning and without due process.  Well, I suppose at least now, Brennan has openly stated precisely why.  For her, I do not matter because of my white skin color, though I also suspect that the autocrat librarian, Lucy Loomis, has relationships with the Brennans of Cape Cod.  And why don’t the Times’ lifer professor-columnists Brent Harold, Dan McCullough, and Lawrence Brown give a damn and write a column, as in “Local Senior Citizen Banned for Life from a Cape Cod Public Library”?  Well, back to rule #1….  Now, here’s an interesting comment from, I suspect, one of Brown’s students regarding the cartoon I sketched on Brown and posted on The American Dissident website (see above link):  


hey your a dumbass to go at mr.B like that. greatest of all time. he is ten timee smarter then you and if you got a problem then my email is dmchockey@.icloud.com if you trying to catch these hands. [sic]


Thursday, February 6, 2025

Curriculum Mortae

 Curriculum Mortae

—A Dissident Citizen Critic’s Resume—

G. Tod Slone, PhD

217 Commerce Rd., Barnstable, MA 02630

todslone@hotmail.comwww.theamericandissident.org 


Dissidence:  If there is no risk when speaking rude truth, there is really no dissidence.  It is for that reason that dissidence really implies, at least in America, criticism on the local level.  Evidently, there is no risk at all criticizing an American president, thanks to democracy’s legal framework.  Examine my two essays:  “The Cold Passion for Truth Hunts in No Pack” and "Notes on RISK and Writing."  


By openly criticizing academic/literary establishment curators et al, I personally risked jobs, promotions, invitations, grants, awards, publications, and ostracizing.  As for the latter, the Cape Cod Times, for example, will not include me in its list of Cape Cod authors because I’ve dared criticize its editors.  The Academy of American Poets, Poets & Writers, Poetry Foundation, NewPages.com, Arts & Letters (Chronicle of Higher Education), Publishers Weekly, American Libraries Magazine et al have essentially blacklisted The American Dissident, the journal I’ve been publishing since 1998.  The very term, dissident, stems from opponents of socialist/communist authoritarian regimes and requisite in-lockstep groupthink.  It needs to be applied more frequently in America because such authoritarianism has become an integral part of the nation.  Those who toe the line—the bulk of so-called professionals—will automatically detest somebody like me. 


Dissident Objectives:  “Go upright and vital, and speak the rude truth in all ways” (Emerson); let my life “be a counterfriction to stop the machine” (Thoreau), “write because there is some lie that I want to expose, some fact to which I want to draw attention” (Orwell), and teach students and others the importance of individuality and dissidence in a democracy, and open their hearts to hardcore criticism, while encouraging them to learn and create from it.  


Dissident Formation and Experience(For a number of other examples of my dissidence, examine “Testing the Waters of Democracy” on The American Dissident website.

The Sixties.  While the Sixties perhaps sensitized me to ubiquitous corruption, it also pressured me to de-individualize, groupthink, and group behave, in essence, prerequisites for a successful career as an academic or other such “professional.”  

Université du Maine (1980-82) and École Nationale de Mécanique (1982-88). While a lecteur de langue anglaise in France, I became interested in reprobates Villon, Céline, and even Ferré, as well as other French authors.  There, I also read Bukowski for the first time and in French and consequently wrote some of my first poems in French.  

Elmira College (1989-1991) Faculty/administrative corruption/apathy transformed me into a firm dissident (i.e., truth-speaking individual, as opposed to careerist ladder climber).  Deans sided with a handful of students, who complained now and then that I’d offended their sensitivities.

—My first truly critical essays and poems were published in The Octagon, the student newspaper. They dared question and challenge my so-called colleagues, as well as administrators.

—I created and disseminated my first critical newsletters, “Purple Marasmus,” which I distributed mostly to the Humanities faculty, who were harshly criticized in them.  Elmira’s color logo is purple.  

Fitchburg State College (1991-1996). My eyes were further opened to academic corruption (e.g., a closet homosexual department chair wanting me to visit him every weekend at his home, highly whimsical faculty evaluations, nepotism, a prevaricating dean and apathetic faculty). The American Association of University Professors and the ACLU of Massachusetts remained silent regarding my grievances of state-college corruption.

—Eviction from my college office (McKay Campus) mid-semester w/o due process because of one complaint by a colleague that she was afraid of me, despite my having no criminal record and no accusations of threat making.   To this day, I could be arrested if I stepped foot on McKay Campus.

—Received a year’s salary as settlement payment after a lengthy in-house hearing.  The college never admitted wrong-doing.

—The student, local, and state newspapers (Boston Globe), as well as The Chronicle of Higher Education, refused to publish my accounts of corruption at Fitchburg State.  And so I created a newsletter, Corruption Magazine, which morphed into Corruption Massachusetts.

Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School (1998).  My experience at this lauded “blue-ribbon” high school, as a full-time substitute teacher, resulted in a few highly critical published op-eds in the local newspaper, The Martha’s Vineyard Times, as well as a non-fiction novel, Total Chaos (People’s Press, 2001).  

The American Dissident (1998). A 501 3c nonprofit journal of literature, democracy, and dissidence places rude-truth telling and risk above team-playing, networking, and turning a blind eye.  To date, 48 issues have been published and distributed across the country.  Yale, Johns Hopkins, Buffalo State, and a few other institutions of higher learning currently subscribe.  It has been a virtual battle to get libraries to do so.  

Walden Pond State Reservation (1999).  Arrest and incarceration in a Concord jail cell for a day.  I was solo protesting the absence of free speech at Walden Pond State Reservation.  Both the local media and Thoreau Society were pathetically apathetic with that regard.  Three months later, Judge Sanders dropped the case against me at the Concord Court House.  

Bennett College (2001-2003).  A number of highly critical op-eds were published in the local and college newspapers.  

Festival International de la Poésie de Trois-Rivières (Québec—2001).  The only invited and remunerated poet out of 150 who dared criticize the hands that feed in the form of poems I’d written in French.  Never was I invited back.   PEN Canada refused to respond to my criticism of the Festival.

Eastern Connecticut University (2002). Wrong skin color (and who knows how many other institutions I’d applied to rejected me for the same reason). Agustin Bernal, Dept. Chair noted:  “The search for the tenure-track position in Spanish/French was declared ‘failed’ by the administration, after three equally acceptable finalists (you among them) were submitted to them for campus interviews. The entire pool of candidates was reviewed and they concluded it wasn't ‘deep’ or ‘diverse’ enough to be satisfactory.”

—The Concord Poetry Center (2004).  Director Joan Houlihan stated:  “The idea of your teaching a workshop or delivering a lecture on the art of literary protest or poetry protest, or simply protest (Concord is where it all started!) occurred to me even before you mentioned it, so, yes, it’s something I will consider as we progress (this is only our first event).  However, I must say I don’t favor having you teach at the center if you protest the reading.”  Evidently, I chose to protest the reading.    

—The complete silence of PEN New England (“defending freedom of expression”), regarding impediments to my freedom of expression and the likely influence of poet Joan Houlihan on PEN director Karen Wulf, both comfortably installed at Lesley University, further provoked my questioning and challenging of such organizations.

—The silence of some 500 college English professors regarding my attempts to interest them in radically altering the academic culture of sycophancy, turning a blind eye, careerism, PC, and prevarication confirmed my observations that college professors tended to be apparatchik careerists first, while truth tellers last.  

geocities.com/enmarge.  That was my first website URL, which was removed sometime in the mid 2000s due to one anonymous complaint.  Geocities refused to respond to my protest with that regard.  Vice noted that “Geocities was one of the first places your average person could make a website for free.”  Yeah, well, it was also one of the first places that began censoring websites!  

Grambling State University (2005-2007).  This was my second experience at an all black HBCU.  There I found the same intellectual corruption, as I’d found at Bennett College,… and wrote a number of highly critical op-eds published in the student newspaper.  Bravo to the black students at both of those institutions for publishing them.

Watertown Free Public Library (2008).  The director issued a six-month no-trespass order with my regard without due process, for my attempting to interest its reference librarian in subscribing to The American Dissident.  No threats were ever made, nor was I accused of making any.

Academy of American Poets (2009).  My comments on the Academy’s website were censored and I was banned from participating in its online forums.  No reason was provided for the banning.  Examine “https://theamericandissident.org/orgs/academy_american_poets.html

American Public University (2010-2017).  Online instructor of English.  This was my very last teaching job… because I disobeyed the Chair’s order that I cease expressing myself… regarding criticism lodged against me.  

Sturgis Library (2012).  Permanently banned from my neighborhood library w/o warning and w/o due process.  The reason:  “for the safety of the staff and public.”  Five days prior to the banning I’d sent an open letter to the library directors of the Clams Library System of Cape Cod, critical of their collection development policy, which states, “libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view.”  Also, prior to the banning, the Barnstable Patriot had interviewed me.  I’d written a second open letter.  See http://wwwtheamericandissidentorg.blogspot.com/2025/01/open-letter-to-public-librarians-of.html and https://wwwtheamericandissidentorg.blogspot.com/search?q=open+letter


Dissident Publications. Numerous critical letters to the editor of student newspapers at colleges employing me confirmed professor indifference to matters of corruption, free speech, and vigorous debate.  A number of those letters can be viewed on my blog (see http://wwwtheamericandissidentorg.blogspot.com/).  Numerous publications of poetry, essays, satirical cartoons, novels, and plays.  Some of those publications can also be viewed on The American Dissident website, globalfreepress.org/contributors/usa/g-tod-slone, and globalfreepress.org/cartoonists/g-tod-slone

Dissident Art Exhibits.  Critical art exhibits at the Concord Free Public Library (2008) and Sturgis Library (2011).

Solo Protests.  Staging of various solo protests critical of state-sponsored poets at the Concord Poetry Center, Concord Free Public Library, Robert Creeley Prize in Acton, and elsewhere sadly confirmed poets were largely indifferent to questions of free speech and vigorous debate.  

Foreign Languages Spoken and Written:  French (near-native fluency—Parisian and Québécois), Spanish (fluent), Italian (intermediate fluency), German (reading fluency)

Professional Formation & Experience

Doctorate in Canadian Studies (Université de Nantes, Nantes, France) 

M.A. in French (Middlebury College) 

B.A. in Psychology (Northeastern University)

Online adjunct English/Spanish instructor, American Public University System; English instructor, US Navy (Central Texas College), visiting professor of French and Spanish (Grambling State University), online writing instructor (Davenport University), assistant professor of French and Spanish (Bennett College) and (Fitchburg State College), assistant professor of humanities (Elmira College), lecteur de langue anglaise (École Nationale Supérieure de Mécanique, Nantes, France) and Université du Maine (Le Mans, France), adult education instructor of Spanish (Concord-Carlisle Adult & Community Education, Concord, MA), high school mid-year replacement teacher of Spanish (Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School, MA), community-college instructor of Spanish (Mount Wachussetts Community College, Gardener, MA), language-program director in Martinique, France (ASA International Adventures, Amronk, NY), lecturer of French (Northeastern University, Boston, MA), high-school teacher of French (Nazareth Academy, Wakefield, MA), shipyard welder (General Dynamics), radiation monitor (Groton submarine base), FDIC bank examiner (South Dakota), interpreter/translator (Le Mans auto race—11 consecutive years), census taker, etc…

Publications See http://theamericandissident.org/g_tod_slone_books.html.(needs to be updated)


NB:  On Cape Cod in Massachusetts, where I've been living since 2010, due to my testing the waters of democracy, all cultural institutions have closed their doors to my writing and art.  


This CM is a work in progress…

Saturday, February 1, 2025

Eric Wemple Washington Post

Cartoon sketched in 2013.
........................................................

 

Monday, January 27, 2025

Open Letter to the Public Librarians of Cape Cod

The following was written back in 2012 prior to the permanent banning decree.  I put it up now because I can't find it in this blog.

Open Letter to the Public Librarians of Cape Cod

In almost all the 45 libraries studied here, and probably hundreds and hundreds more across the country, we have failed our professional duty to seek out diverse political views. [...] These books are not expensive. Their absence from our libraries makes a mockery of ALA’s vaunted ‘freedom to read.’ But we do not even notice that we are censoring our collections. Complacently, we watch our new automated systems stuff the shelves with Henry Kissinger’s memoirs. 

—Charles Willett, Founding Editor, Counterpoise, and retired librarian [remarks presented at the Fifth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries]


To Brenda Collins (Cape Cod Community College), Kathy Cockcroft (Brewster), Patrick Marshall (Bourne), Elizabeth Butler (Centerville), Irene Gillies (Chatham), Jennie Wiley (Cotuit), Nancy Symington (Dennis Memorial), Jessica Langlois (Dennis), Phil Inman (East Dennis), Cheryl Bryan (Eastham), Lisa Sherman (Edgartown), Leslie A. Morrissey (Falmouth), Ginny Hewitt (Harwich), Renee Voorhees (Marstons Mills), Kathleen Mahoney (Mashpee), Sondra Murphy (Oak Bluffs), Lee Ann Amend (Osterville), Cheryl Napsha (Provincetown), Lucy Loomis (Sturgis), Tricia Ford (Truro), Ann-Louise Harries (Hyannis), Amy Ryan (Vineyard Haven), Elaine McIlroy (Wellfleet), Kathleen Swetish (West Barnstable), Pamela Olson (West Falmouth), Shirley Barron (South Yarmouth), Anne Cifelli (Yarmouth Port):


Thanks to the Internet, this letter will form part of the public record, as it is now published on The American Dissident blog site (wwwtheamericandissidentorg.blogspot.com). If none of you respond, as is perhaps likely, that shall be noted. By the way, it took me about an hour to locate and compile your names and email addresses. In fact, a few of you do not even list your names and email addresses on your library’s website. Why not? 

In any case, most of you, I’ve already contacted in vain, which is why I am writing this letter. A number of you have simply ignored my communications (e.g., Osterville, Falmouth, Brewster Ladies). Others simply greeted me with frowns, while a few actually banned my flyers on their public grounds (Sturgis and Yarmouth Port). In fact, the director of Sturgis Library even instructed me not to speak to staff with regards the banning and rejected a free subscription offer to The American Dissident, a 501c3 nonprofit journal devoted to literature, democracy, and dissidence, printed in Barnstable. And yet why should I even be offering a free subscription? Do Time, Poetry, People, and National Geographic do that? 

Not one of you to date has been willing to subscribe (only $20/year) to the journal or express an unusual openness to the ideas expounded in it. The Clams network of libraries on Cape Cod has consequently conveyed a uniform closed-mindedness with its regard. Why? Is it because the journal’s substance is DEMOCRACY and CRITICISM, as opposed to the sex and violence you tend to purchase in the form of DVDs? Is it simply a panem et circenses issue? 

What is therefore wrong with the libraries on Cape Cod? Why do they all seem to be staffed with chamber-of-commerce-friendly directors, instead of free-thinking citizens with a definite responsibility towards democracy? Why do you seem to fear and disdain criticism so much? Why do you seem so opposed to vigorous debate and freedom of speech, democracy’s cornerstones? On the one hand, you celebrate Banned Books Week while, on the other, you ban periodicals like The American Dissident. How do you manage to intellectually justify such egregious hypocrisy? 

In the case of Sturgis Library, the collection development policy clearly stipulates: “Libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view […],” “Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval […], and “Libraries should challenge censorship […].” With that regard, Sturgis subscribes to Poetry magazine, which presents the established-order point of view on what constitutes good poetry, but refuses to subscribe to The American Dissident, which clearly presents an anti-established-order viewpoint regarding poetry. One might wonder how the director intellectually justifies such an evident breach of the collection development policy. “This is a family-friendly place” and “I think there’s too much negativity” constitute her rationale. Yet such remarks clearly skirt the issue entirely and do not, by any means whatsoever, constitute a valid explanation. Besides, since when did democracy and dissidence become family un-friendly, while sex and violence family friendly? Perhaps librarians need to take courses on logical argumentation. By the way, the staff at Sturgis have been friendly and quite helpful. Clearly, this letter is not directed at them. As for the two trustees, Ellie Claus and Betsy Newell, with whom I met, they proved as closed-minded as the director. Dan Santos, the third trustee, didn’t even bother showing up for the meeting. 

As you certainly must know, the above policy statements come directly from the American Library Association’s “Library Bill of Rights.” Interestingly, or rather aberrantly, the ALA’s Office of Intellectual Freedom (Ministry of Intellectual Freedom in Orwell’s 1984) simply refuses to respond to my grievance regarding Sturgis. Not a word from it! Not even a lame rationalization, as in “we’re family friendly.” Silence seems to have become, for far too many librarians, the librarian’s modus operandi, the de facto “Library Bill of Rights.” Librarians on the Cape, rather than individuals, seem to move as a groupthink librarian herd. 

In any event, what good can it do the nation to have directors like you in charge of what the public may or may not read in its public libraries? What good can it possibly do for democracy? Why would not one of you likely accept a bulletin-board donation for a space devoted to DEMOCRACY? On top of such a board, one could write: WARNING: POSTINGS ON THIS BOARD MAY BE OFFENSIVE TO ADULT CHILDREN. 

As a tax-paying citizen, should I not be fully outraged that my voice is banned at one of your public libraries? Should I not be outraged that bed & breakfast brochures, Prime Time, and other free publications are permitted, but not my 501c3 nonprofit flyers? Even dogs have been permitted to run around inside the library! If one or even two of you do not believe in the curiosity-killed-the-cat dictum (it’s so much easier to be indignant!), read the article published in Counterpoise for Social Responsibilities, Liberty, and Dissent, regarding my struggle vis-à-vis democracy-scorning public librarians exterior to the Cape (www.theamericandissident.org/orgs/american_library_association.html). Thank you for your hopeful attention. 



Monday, January 6, 2025

Alex Buchanan, Armchair Anarchist

The following was published in issue #48 of The American Dissident.  Part 1 was published in issue #47, as was the cartoon below.  

..........................................................

...............................................................

A Dialogue de sourds with an Armchair Anarchist

Part II

Many have been inclined to kill the messenger by character assassination: they say he is a womanizer, he is bitter, he was unsuccessfully analyzed, he is disloyal, he is even, in the words of one accuser, ''dangerously mentally ill.'' Mr. Masson himself wonders whether it was ''possible that the analysts could not hear my 'message' because the messenger was so obnoxious.'' But to those in power, all whistle-blowers, dissenters and boat-rockers are obnoxious, at least while they remain lone rebels. One protester is crazy, two are a conspiracy and three are a movement.

— Carol Tavris, social psychologist at the University of California, Los Angeles

 

s a critical writer and thinker, I make an effort to avoid ad hominem.  Now and then, however, when someone blasts me with insults, usually via psychological projection, I’ll slip and blast back with the same crap, although always after I’ve attacked the message via facts and reason.  In essence, to kill the messenger via ad hominem is a very common ploy today, conscious or not, in an effort to divert attention away from the message.  Politics stands as a pitiful example of that.  It is also a tactic used when one is incapable of responding with a factual, logical retort to the messenger’s message. 

     After a lengthy nine-month or more back and forth almost on a daily basis with self-proclaimed anarchist, Alex Buchanan, I decided to terminate the dialogue de sourds, for it had become a waste of time.  Evidently, anarchy was an ideology.  Reason and facts are ineluctably the prime enemies of ideologues.  And so I wrote:  

BTW, I am not pissed off in the least.  It's quite simply that you and I hold completely different viewpoints... and that we've essentially expressed them... and that the discussion is now going nowhere... but into the cesspool of childish name-calling.  So, I simply suggest terminating the "discussion."  I've got better things to do... and hopefully you do too.   

nd of course Buchanan responded in an endlessly long email, which was his usual m.o., so I simply wrote without reading the whole thing:    “Pipedream away…  A world without hierarchies is certainly a pipedream.”  I let him have the last word, which he did in a single sentence. 

At least I float above the delusional sea of reactionary nihilism.

But then, I couldn’t resist and responded:  Not quite sure how death is somehow a delusion.  In any case, I don’t really abide by a particular ideology, unless belief in reality like inevitable death somehow constitutes one.  In that reality, when I die, I won’t give a damn about anything or anyone.  And in that sense, how not to be a cynic, for cynicism is reality.  Also, I suppose I am a reactionary because I am against in-lockstep groupthink socialism/communism and the metastasizing of Marxist DEI/CRT ideology today in all spheres of society including the press, literature, and education… and the consequent racism obsession, chaotic, uh anarchic, open borders and resultant increase in crime, drugs, sex trafficking, and unfettered government spending, absence of accountability, and war-all-the-time.  How that somehow makes me “delusional” is a quandary.  And so Buchanan wrote yet again.  

A space of perennial negativity becomes exhausting, because nothing can be created or affirmed there.  I wrote that yesterday. As well as this, which was in my journal: Slone’s cruelty has resulted in more creativity than probably would have been standard. I can at least give him that.

     How not to respond to the “cruelty” remark… and so I did.  


As I reflect, your “Slone’s cruelty” remark is indeed extraordinary.  To label all of my life’s “work” of anti-establishment criticism—hundreds of pages of essays, poems, and cartoons—as “cruelty” even outdoes the insults I’ve received over the decades from other artiste and poet cogs of the establishment, be they socialist, communist, capitalist, reactionary, or anarchist.  

And with your fine art of incomprehensible “density,” as you labeled it, I’m sure you’ll somehow weasel around the remark…

To dismiss a critic like me as “cruel” is a clear indication of your true anarchist hatred for freedom of speech, the very cornerstone of democracy—obviously NOT of anarchy.  Murder, torture, rape, etc. are “cruel.”  Exercise of freedom of speech is NOT “cruel,” unless of course one is a left-wing snowflake who hates the message of the speaker.   

ell, I guess I “cruelly” rejected his masterpiece essay (see last issue for a few examples from it!  LOL!  And, man, he really does constantly employ psychological projection!  “Berserk”?  Projection 101!  And so, the anarchist weaseled around the remark.  

My remark that you're cruel has only to do with your personality, not your "life's work." It's odd to see you even refer to what you do as "work." Who has validated it as such? By the way, your definition of "anti-establishment" is incoherent, big surprise. This is because your definition seems to demonstrate that all "the establishment" is in your head is any entity which is not you. Far from being anti-establishment, that is nihilistic solipsism. Moreover, by no metric whatsoever can you say that anarchists are the establishment. As for merely myself, I'm the furthest possible distance from the establishment as one could get. In my writing, I didn't dismiss you as cruel.

     And so, I was left wondering how Buchanan knows me so well that he can conclude that my “personality” is so “cruel.”  Hell, I never even met the guy!  Aberrantly, he ended with yet another ad hominem.

Against your bourgeois masochism, 

This anarchist who believes in egalitarian freedom

     And so I responded.  

You, clearly, are bourgeois!  If you weren't, then you'd be working in a factory, painting houses, picking grapes, or shipyard welding like I once did.  Instead, you sit and write. How much more bourgeois can one get?  You want to get paid for your writing; I do not want to get paid for mine.  So, who is really the bourgeois writer?  Again, you project!!!  Projection is your m.o..  

Your idols were/are "bourgeois" including Marx, Chomsky, Bernie, Che (bourgeois medical doctor), and on and on.   Weasel out of that reality!  And, how the hell am I a “masochist’?

     Well, he didn’t respond…