Joseph Epstein

Below is the brief correspondance I had with Epstein.  Note how predictable Epstein is.  Give him a compliment, and he is gracious.  But dare criticize him, and he enrages.  "Epstein has a cult following as a sharp-tongued literary critic and stylist," notes Michael Johnson in his hagiographical review.  Well, someone with a sharp tongue ought to have a little backbone, especially in case of a fall from the ole high horse.  People seem to gravitate to fakes and charlatans.  Look at how many have gravitated to Obama.

Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"George Slone"
Subject:	Great essay!
To:	j-epstein@northwestern.edu

Dear Joe,

That was a great essay you wrote on Honorary Degrees!  Thanks much for it.  It was bold, honest, and quite dissident. 

From:	"joseph epstein"
Subject:	Re: Great essay!
Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:10:07 -0500
To:	"George Slone"

Top of Fo

 

Dear Mr. Slone

Many thanks for these kind and generous words. 

Best wishes, Joseph Epsten 

Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"George Slone"
Subject:	Re: Great essay!
To:	"joseph epstein"

The fellow actually responded!  Ah, well, that's because I sent a compliment.  I'm an informal fellow, so I meant no disrespect whatsoever by calling you "Joe."  That said, I've just read yet another of your essays.  It is unusual, to say the least, for an academic to write negatively on academe.  So, kudos again.  Maya Angelou, how interesting!  She's a trustee at Bennett College where I used to teach.  BTW, I am an ardent and outspoken critic of academe.  It is academe that sparked my creating a literary journal.  Below is one of my many academic poems based on factual occurrence.  Now, you need to write an essay on the academic poem!  I liked the one you wrote on the academic novel... very much!  No need at all to comment or reply.  I want nothing whatsoever from you.  I shall be quoting you! 

Submission to the Pulitzer Prize Committee for Poetry
Thematic:  Higher Education

University Office Corridor

Ah, another minor dispute in the

corridor
—my little pleasure for the day—

the Spanish professor bitching

with the department coordinator,

wanting to know why red pens

were not purchased with the new

department budget monies

I’d just received my paltry pile:

a brand new grade book
—the Coord hates my using

the registrar’s print-out rosters—,

a pile of outdated floppies,

and some black magic markers,

the erasable kind employed

to write up a storm on the board

in a last-ditch effort to mesmerize

“I DON’T NEED THESE BLACK

DISKS EITHER!

I TOLD YOU I NEEDED RED

PENS!”

“ But Dr. Abella, they only cost ten

for 99 cents! 

You know the Dean would never

approve of such a small purchase!”

From:	"joseph epstein"
Subject:	Re: Great essay!
Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:28:24 -0500
To:	"George Slone"

Top

Briefly to set the record straight: I stopped teaching five years ago. I have no advanced degrees; I began teaching in my middle-thirties. I had some good students, and took my teaching responsibilities seriously, but always thought of myself as primarily a writer and only secondarily a teacher. I never had tenure during my thirty years at Northwestern; nor did I want it.  I have never had any great regard for academics, at least not on the humanities and social science side, and in recent decades I have come to view most of them as essentially comic characters, lunatics of one bad idea or another, puffed up by their own unearned self-esteem. 

Your poem brought on a smile of recognition. 

JE

Date:	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"George Slone"
Subject:	Re: Great essay!
To:	"joseph epstein"

Top of Form

Well, I’ve been in and out of the game for about 20 years now (6 years at two French universities, 4 years at two southern HBCUs, 5 at a northern state college, 3 at a northern private college, 4 months on two US navy destroyers)… and must agree with you entirely.  Brilliant observations:  “The spirit of capitalism, for all that might be said on its behalf, wreaks havoc when applied to culture and education.” “Universities attract people who are good at school. Being good at school takes a real enough but very small talent.”  Thank you for stating them!  I’ve just ordered your cardboard book from the public library.  
 

BTW, I used to try to get published in the American Scholar, but have given up.  It seems the journal prefers highbrow tonality to straightforward critique.  Your writing tends to be replete with quips, while mine devoid of them.  But one must remain flexible in mind.  Hell, how can I restrict myself to those who only write like me?  

The literary milieu, which tends to be intricately entwined with the academic milieu, tends to be as tragicomical as the academic milieu.  You might get a “charge” out of a censorship incident regarding the Academy of American Poets (National Poetry Month sponsors).  See www.theamericandissident.org/AcademyAmericanPoets.htm.

You might also get a “charge” from some of the responses I’ve received over the years from academics and literati.  They form part of a long essay I published (see www.theamericandissident.org/ColdPassion.htm).  You’ll note that I’m also a cartoonist. 

These things said, please do not feel obligated to respond.  Your essays made my morning!

Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"George Slone"
Subject:	Your book
To:	j-epstein@northwestern.edu

JE:

Waded through your book (i.e., cardboard).  It would have been much more interesting if you had published an honest critique on Poetry magazine and the Poetry Foundation, which refuses, by the way, to list The American Dissident on its site next to other poetry journals.  (BTW, the Academy of American Poets censored me permanently from participating in its forums.)  “Heterodoxy is one of the things serious poetry is, or at least ought to be, about,” you state.  Well, shouldn’t it also be one of the things serious essay writing is? 

Writing that actually bites the hand that feeds (e.g., risks something on the part of the writer) is and will be the most powerful writing.  Compare, for example, your essay “Thank you, No” [published in Poetry] to Sinclair Lewis’ “Letter to the Pulitzer Prize Committee.”  Compare Mandelstam’s “Staline” or Villon’s “Estoit-il lors temps de moy taire?” or Saro Wiwa’s “The True Prison” or Levi’s “Se questo e un uomo” with any poems written by our American poets frequently pushed in Poetry magazine.  

Essays failing to risk anything tend to become a dime a high-brow dozen in American letters, the kind Poetry and New Yorker will eagerly publish because of name recognition and high-brow tonality.  Naming names is great for quality control.  You did that RE Bloom, and I commend you for it.  You could have also done that with Poetry mag.  Rather than sit comfortably at Northwestern now that you're retired why not hammer away at that place.  Surely, it must be intrinsically corrupt.  Or are you hoping for a graduation ceremony gig?  What does emeritus tend to mean, if not didn't make waves, didn't go against the academic grain, and never rocked the Northwestern boat? 

From:	"joseph epstein"
Subject:	Re: Your book
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:07:32 -0500
To:	"George Slone"

Dear Mr Slone, 

   I regret that you wrote this e-mail, based on such minimal knowledge of me and my writing. I hope some day that you will, too. 

Joseph Epstein

Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"George Slone"
Subject:	Emeritus or poet laureate, what difference, especially in the Humanities?
To:	"joseph epstein"

Dear Joseph Epstein, Emeritus Instructor, Northwestern University: 
Please be assured I was not trying to make you feel bad or otherwise insult you per se, but rather simply trying to point out a gross inconsistency vis-a-vis the poet laureate and emeritus designations.  When I wrote to mention I enjoyed your article, that was truth.  

“As a man who has published a single poem, my own position is that I would like to be asked to be poet laureate of the United States so that I could refuse it, for this seems to me a job that would bring much greater glory to turn down than to take up,” you rightly state.

Why, however, should the same not be equally stated regarding the emeritus designation?  Imagine if you had stood up and rejected it… like Sinclair Lewis had rejected the Pulitzer?  Now, that would have made news.  Are you aware of any professors who have ever rejected it?  I’m not. 

“I think it fair to say that one of the first qualifications of an American poet laureate is that he not in any way be dangerous,” you rightly state again. 

Well, all I did was affirm that the first qualification of an emeritus is normally that he not in any way be dangerous either… at least not to the institution employing him.  In fact, he might also be tempted to turn a blind eye or even lie for that institution.  Yes, I know several emeriti who have done that with my regard.  Of course, I’m not at all implying that you would do that. 

Over the years, I’ve observed those employed or otherwise fed by the academic/literay, established-order milieu committing similar inconsistencies and breaches in logic. Quite frankly, I think I caught you in a gross contradiction, one that your indignant response sparked me to perceive.  In other words, I hadn’t even thought about it prior to your last email.  It probably merits a cartoon. 

Finally, I have noted your full indifference regarding my comment that the Academy of American Poets censored me and banned me from participating in its online forums.  That indifference I have also commonly observed over the years by those of the academic/literay established-order milieu. 

A Note on Freedom of Speech

In the front of my little house I posted a bulletin board about six months ago, announcing  THE AMERICAN DISSIDENT, as well as my expulsion from Sturgis Library.  Now and then, I'll see a neighbor looking up at the board and reading its contents.  To date, not one person has contacted me regarding it or The American Dissident flyers kept next to the board.   Overt Free Speech in front of ones home can of course be risky because always there are cretins who hate Free Speech and will seek retribution in the form of property damage or whatever.  Ainsi soit-il. 

Yesterday, I posted the following on the board:   

A Note on Freedom of Speech

                By Citizen Maudit

The BILL RIGHTS does not guarantee citizens from being OFFENDED.  Most citizens do not know the limits of the First Amendment and seem to be accepting of pressure, mostly leftist, to reduce it in an effort to eliminate “offensiveness.”   What the First Amendment does not protect is speech that incites imminent violence.  However, the HECKLER’S VETO, no matter how violent, cannot legally truncate the right to freedom of speech. 

SPEECH CODES, mostly unconstitutional have been adopted in over 3/5 of the nation’s public colleges and universities, mostly by faceless left-wing administrators and professors.  University of Massachusetts is amongst the worst of the worst!  Another example of the war on free speech is the ISTANBUL PROCESS in which both Obama and Hillary have been actively engaged with the Muslim Brotherhood to establish unconstitutional anti-blasphemy laws in America.  Likely most citizens remain blissfully ignorant with that regard. 

America is unique, amongst Western nations—a model of freedom of speech and expression, thanks to its First Amendment.  Most such nations, including Canada, have less freedom because of adopted HATE SPEECH regulations.  Citizens of those countries can be prosecuted for uttering a mere fact, if a protected group decides to be offended by it and lodge a complaint.  This has happened, for example, in Austria, Holland, Denmark, England, and Canada.

Intelligently, as the adage goes, the best solution for hate speech is more speech… not government censorship and regulation.  Besides, “hate” is a highly subjective term, which makes prosecution difficult. 

On the 4^th of July, I held a sign:  CELEBRATE THE FIRST FUCKING AMENDMENT, NOT COMMERCE.  Many were upset.  Amazingly, most could not fathom the message.  All they could see was the F-word.  One guy looked so angry, I thought he was going to attack me.  In fact, he called me Charles Manson.  But words are protected speech in America, thanks to the First Amendment.   Citizens must not be afraid to use them or, if they are, they submit to control by others.  Citizens must push at the boundaries of subjective propriety, now and then, or those boundaries will push at and further oppress citizens.  

Imagine the day when typing the word FUCK on a laptop computer is no longer possible because of faceless government censors!  And what if the latter decide to add BAD and its numerous synonyms to the list of prohibited vocabulary?  And what if through high tech they’ll be able to eliminate criticism altogether?  Well, then we’ll have Orwell’s 1984 prophesy of “Newspeak,” a deliberate intent to shrink vocabulary in an effort to control the citizenry.  

……………………………………………..

BTW, not one library on Cape Cod will subscribe ($20) to The American Dissident!  It is as if the library directors on the Cape are of one mind… against freedom of speech and vigorous debate, DEMOCRACY’S CORNERSTONES.  Maybe you’d like to be the first person on the Cape to do so?

Louise Gluck

 

Above is the front cover of Issue #10, featuring Louise Gluck, safely tenured at Williams College and Poet Laureate Lackey of the US Congress at the time.  The issue was sent to Gluck, who as faithful academic did not of course respond.  Williams College library, of course, will not subscribe.

Anita Walker

Open Letter to Anita Walker,
Executive Director, Massachusetts Cultural Council
Currently I am working on the new front cover illustration for The American Dissident, a 501 c3 nonprofit journal devoted to literature, democracy, and dissidence. I have a photo of you, O’Leary and others handing a check to Lucy Loomis, director of Sturgis Library in Barnstable. Since you will be depicted naked with Loomis and O’Leary on the front cover (“The Little Emperors Have No Clothes”), I wanted to give you a chance to respond prior to my completion of the illustration. My complaint regarding Loomis and Sturgis Library is quite simple.  

The library’s own policy stipulates “Libraries should challenge censorship […].” Yet Sturgis not only banned my flyers, but also permanently banned me from its premises on June 19^th without due process or even warning. Why? Well, I’d had the audacity to WRITE criticism regarding Loomis’ egregious hypocrisy vis-a-vis that written library policy. No threats, four-letter words, or sexual innuendos were made in my WRITTEN comments. Mind-boggling? You bet!

My question to you is quite simple: Why would you wish to support such a fascistic director and institution with taxpayer monies?

Finally, it is sad that the MCC refuses to help support The American Dissident, a unique literary journal that actually dares criticize cultural institutions… like the MCC itself. In fact, I no longer apply for local MCC grants. Why bother when state culture tends to be defined as politically-correct, anodyne smiley-faced?

Surprise me with a response. Surprise me that you are not so entangled in politics that you can actually think with clarity. If I do not hear from you, this letter will appear in the issue. Thank you for your attenion. 

 

[NO RESPONSE!]

 

Walker is depicted above in the watercolor as a state toadie wearing a crown.

 

 

Gibor Basri

John Sexton