The following broadside was distributed in front of Sturgis Library, during librarian Anne Speyer's lecture there in 2014. The hypocrisy of Speyer and library director Lucy Loomis is mind-numbing. Yes, today, those who ban books and people celebrate Banned Books Week! And those who don't give a damn about banned books in their own neighborhood present lectures on banned books and censorship. Mind-numbing...
......................................
Librarians Banning Books Celebrate Banned Books Week
(What Anne Speyer’s Lecture Will Fail to Mention)
Of course, free speech is often precisely about pissing off other people—challenging social taboos or political values.
—Jonathan Turley, left-wing legal scholar, George Washington University
Mostly, we have hypocrites in politics. No surprise there. We also have hypocrites in higher education. No surprise there either. We have hypocrites in the ranks of those professing to be advocates of freedom, including public librarians. Now, that ought to be surprising.
Is it not ironical that some (perhaps many) of the very organizations that promote Banned Books Week are either banners of books or apathetic when books are banned? Is it not equally ironical that some (perhaps many!) of those who attend “Banned Books Discussions,” like “Bowdlerized, Banned, and Burned: An Investigation of Banned Books” presented at Sturgis Library by Director Anne Speyer of South Dennis Free Public Library, don’t give a damn when book or periodical banning occurs in their own backyards? How to possibly understand their apathy, if not outright support? Unsurprisingly, Speyer wouldn’t even respond to that question.
On June 19, 2012, Sturgis Library director Lucy Loomis PERMANENTLY BANNED not only The American Dissident and any books I’ve authored, but also me and the ideas of those published in the journal. On that nefarious day, three cops showed up with the director in the room, where I was quietly working alone on my online college courses, to escort me out of the taxpayer-funded library without warning or even possibility of due process. Imagine that not one library director in the entire Clams Library System of Cape Cod would respond to my Open Letter regarding that authoritarian decision, let alone express an iota of interest in it. The only response I received was an indirect one from Dan Santos, Sturgis Library Trustee at the time and now husband of Lucy Loomis. Santos is current director of Barnstable’s Department of Public Works. His only response regarding my Open Letter was: “He is no more than an exhibitionist engaging in intellectual masturbation.”
Banned for life, yet I never made threats, never made disturbances in that library, and I'd been going to it almost every day for several years! What I did, however, was question and challenge IN WRITING, one week prior to the decree, Loomis’ hypocrisy regarding, especially, the written collection-development statement, borrowed from the American Library Association’s “Library Bill of Rights,” that “libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view.” Well, my point of view is certainly not provided in that library, which proves the point I’d made.
Loomis refused to present me with a written document stipulating the reason for her decision. The library trustees also refused to do that. It took the Massachusetts State Secretary of Records nine months later to order the library to make its records available to me (i.e., the public), since it determined the library was not only being funded by the public but was clearly serving a public purpose. In those records, only an indirect comment by Loomis to Ted Lowry, president of the library trustees, indicated the reason for the decision: “Because of his behavior when the police were here they almost arrested him—he can go from calm to extremely agitated in a matter of seconds. So l believe this is the correct decision for the safety of the staff and public.” No other reason or incident is mentioned in the library’s records! In essence, the only reason was an after-the-fact one (i.e., after the decision to permanently ban).
Really, I was quite pissed off when I saw three cops enter the room with Loomis! I hadn't even spoken to anyone in the library for a week. And yes I was quite pissed off when one of them actually grabbed my arm, twisted it behind my back, and frisked me because I’d said, “I do not have any weapons.” I’m 66 and not a big guy. And I was not making threats in any way whatsoever. Ah, but it turned out that cop was the training officer and showing a new recruit how to frisk a citizen. I have no record of violence whatsoever. In essence, Loomis played the he-makes-me-feel-uncomfortable card. Since that nefarious day over two years ago, if indeed I were such a danger to the staff and public, why have I done nothing at all to harm the staff and public since then? So, here I am today with an almost-arrested police record for the crime of manifesting a little anger in public… and PERMANENTLY punished for it. Bravo America, or rather Barnstable!
Doggedly since that nefarious day in June, I’ve contacted scores of organizations and town officials. To date, not one of them proved sufficiently concerned to offer to help or even write a simple letter to the director, requesting she rescind the authoritarian decree or at least provide due process. Not even the ACLUM or State Attorney General Martha Coakley would lift a finger! To date, not one of the official sponsors of Banned Books Week has been willing to do that either! So, why the hell not American Library Association, PEN America, National Coalition Against Censorship, National Council of Teachers of English, American Book Sellers Association, American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, American Society of Journalists and Authors, Association of American Publishers, Freedom to Read Foundation, National Association of College Stores, Comic Book Legal Defense Fund, Project Censored, and Center for the Book at the Library of Congress? And why did not one town counselor or commissioner of the Barnstable County Human Rights Commission give a damn either?
Essentially, a responsible citizen does not keep his or her mouth shut in the face of injustice, which is why I stand protesting here tonight next to library property. Those attending Speyer’s lecture, who had the curiosity to take a copy of this flyer, should ask themselves after the lecture why they too likely do not give a damn. BTW, featured in the above aquarelle are local hack hypocrites Brian Mannal, Ann Canedy, and Cleon Turner, as puppets of propriety. Indeed, for them and so many others, some vague notion of propriety is far more important than freedom of speech and expression.
..................................
From: todslone@hotmail.com
To: aspeyer@clamsnet.org
CC: sturgislibrary@comcast.net; nsymington@clamsnet.org; ppronovost@capecodonline.com; nhoffenberg@barnstablepatriot.com
Subject: Hypocrites celebrate Banned Books Week... what else is new, eh?
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:55:55 -0400
To Director Anne Speyer, South Dennis Free Public Library:
How do people like you and Lucy Loomis get to be such flaming hypocrites? I’m truly curious! How can you possibly deliver a lecture on Banned Books at Sturgis Library during Banned Books Week without mentioning that Sturgis Library bans books… and patrons like me? Loomis not only permanently banned me in June 2012 without warning or due process for having had the audacity to criticize her hypocrisy regarding Clams library policy; in particular, “libraries should provide materials and information presenting ALLpoints of view.” My point of view and that of those published in The American Dissident have been permanently banned. The American Dissident and any books I’ve authored, including Transcendental Trinkets, Leaves of Democracy, and Triumvirate of the Monkeys have been permeanently banned at Sturgis Library. And you will stand in that library in a week as a grotesque hypocrite and NOT mention that fact. Bravo! Perhaps you’ll be the next Mary Otis Warren award recipient. Yes, you’d be perfect, though Loomis would be better. Of course, you’ll remain silent in the spirit of Banned Books Week. Bravo!
Sincerely,
G. Tod Slone, PhD (universite de Nantes, FR) aka P. Maudit,
Founding Editor (1998)
The American Dissident, a 501c3 Nonprofit Journal of Literature, Democracy, and Dissidence
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 13:47:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Hypocrites celebrate Banned Books Week... what else is new, eh?
From: aspeyer@clamsnet.org
To: todslone@hotmail.com
Mr.Slone,
Never having met you, I have no idea why you're using my first name, but know this. The night of my talk, one I had prepared a year ago on the history of book banning around the world, I was with my much loved 89 year old husband who was facing major surgery we knew could kill him.
I was fulfilling a commitment I had made to give the talk long before the medical stuff descended, but neither that, nor someone handing out leaflets nor much of anything else was my priority. As it happens, I read your leaflet the night of the talk-- one of the attendees brought one in.
You have a right to express yourself in your blog. You had a right to hand out leaflets at the end of the Sturgis Library drive. But I have the right not to engage in further discussion with you or be harassed. I had deleted automatically the first e-mail you sent because I had never heard of you, and I never open e-mail from unknown senders. I have since heard of you so I am responding this once.
Anne Speyer
From: todslone@hotmail.com
To: aspeyer@clamsnet.org
Subject: RE: Hypocrites celebrate Banned Books Week... what else is new, eh?
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 15:05:42 -0400
To Anne Speyer,
Well, that was a great non-response. Yes, and you have a right to be utterly apathetic to the banning of patrons, books, and periodicals in your neighborhood while giving talks about banning and censorship at a library that bans and censors. Whatever makes a person like you and Loomis tick? I shall NEVER know. Yes, you and Loomis have a right to behave as autocrat punishers of FREEDOM OF SPEECH and scorners of DUE PROCESS, while collecting taxpayer funding… on Cape Cod. That is your shame. And if you never open emails from unknown senders then you should NOT be a public librarian.
G. Tod
To Anne Speyer,
Well, that was a great non-response. Yes, and you have a right to be utterly apathetic to the banning of patrons, books, and periodicals in your neighborhood while giving talks about banning and censorship at a library that bans and censors. Whatever makes a person like you and Loomis tick? I shall NEVER know. Yes, you and Loomis have a right to behave as autocrat punishers of FREEDOM OF SPEECH and scorners of DUE PROCESS, while collecting taxpayer funding… on Cape Cod. That is your shame. And if you never open emails from unknown senders then you should NOT be a public librarian. Christ!
G. Tod
From: todslone@hotmail.com
To: aspeyer@clamsnet.org
CC: ppronovost@capecodonline.com; sturgislibrary@comcast.net; editor@barnstablepatriot.com; editor.camelsaloon@gmail.com
Subject: Anne Speyer lampooned in a new P. Maudit cartoon
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:16:14 -0400
To Director Anne Speyer, South Dennis Library,
You've been lampooned in a new P. Maudit cartoon (see http://wwwtheamericandissidentorg.blogspot.com/2014/10/ann-speyer.html). Thanks to the Internet, my voice WILL be heard. One day, of course, those like you, Loomis, Pronovost, and Hoffenberg will control the Internet and keep voices like mine out of the arena of debate. When that day comes, democracy will be no more...
Sincerely,
G. Tod Slone
No comments:
Post a Comment