A Forum for Vigorous Debate, Cornerstone of Democracy
A FORUM FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND VIGOROUS DEBATE, CORNERSTONES OF DEMOCRACY
[For the journal--guidelines, focus, etc.--go to www.theamericandissident.org. If you have questions, please contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org. Comments are NOT moderated (i.e., CENSORED)!]
Encouraged censorship and self-censorship seem to have become popular in America today. Those who censor others, not just self, tend to favor the term "moderate," as opposed to "censor" and "moderation" to "censorship." But that doesn't change what they do. They still act as Little Caesars or Big Brother protectors of the thin-skinned. Democracy, however, demands a tough populace, not so easily offended. On this blog, and to buck the trend of censorship, banning, and ostracizing, comments are NEVER "moderated." Rarely (almost NEVER) do the targets of these blog entries respond in an effort to defend themselves with cogent counter-argumentation. This blog is testimony to how little academics, poets, critics, newspaper editors, cartoonists, political hacks, cultural council apparatchiks, librarians et al appreciate VIGOROUS DEBATE, cornerstone of democracy. Clearly, far too many of them could likely prosper just fine in places like communist China and Cuba or Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Russia, not to mention Sweden, England, and Austria.
More P. Maudit cartoons (and essays) at Global Free Press: http://www.globalfreepress.org
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
CC: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Subject: Kaminer, McCartney and Sophian J. Houston lampooned in a new P. Maudit cartoon
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:12:50 -0500
Friday, November 14, 2014
Notes on Michael Dirda's Review of Ted Kooser's Splitting an Order
Perhaps Kooser is “enjoyable” to you, but why should he be enjoyable to me and other individual thinkers? Sure, hordes of academics could likely write 350-page dissertations on that poem, but does that make it great… or even simply good? And isn’t great subjective? Yet you and so many other established-order cogs would have people believe it is an objective term. Now, what I look for in a poem is obviously NOT what you look for: unusual wisdom, as opposed to sentimentality, for example, over a dead dog. What you and other literati of the established-order do is promote the innocuous, like Ted Kooser, because the innocuous does not upset established-order literati. It is really quite that simple.
Few poems contain unusual wisdom like, for example, Villon’s “Estoit-il lors temps de moy taire?,” Jeffers’ “Finally I say let demagogues and world-redeemers babble/ their emptiness/ To empty ears; twice duped is too much./ Walk on gaunt shores and avoid the people” and Neruda’s “Nací para golpear las puertas, para empuñar los golpes,/ para encender las últimas y arrinconadas sombras/en donde se alimenta la araña venenosa./ Serán nombrados.”
What we need are poets with guts like Villon, who dared criticize the ruling Parisian theocrats during his time and risked death by hanging. Where are those poets today in America who RISK in their poetry upsetting established-order apparatchiks, who promote coopted, innocuous poetry… and thus weaken literature, dulling its blade, rendering it palatable for the established order?
Why not try being original and not push celebrity literati in your literati columns? Why not seek out rare poets who really do RISK speaking rude truth in their verse—RISK not getting tenure, RISK not getting grants, RISK not getting invitations, RISK not getting awards, RISK not getting reviewed in your columns? Nature and feelings are fine in poetry, BUT poetry should NOT be limited to those things. “Such imagery from a vanishing America further enforces the overall autumnal quality of these recent poems,” you write regarding Kooser’s new book. Wow. “Overall autumnal quality”! Now, that’s a good one! What about overall RISK and bold TRUTH TELLING?
“But if you reflexively dismiss modern verse as dauntingly esoteric or embarrassingly corny or tediously singsong, you need to try Ted Kooser,” you conclude. Rather than “dauntingly esoteric,” I find modern verse devoid of any criticism at all of the academic/literary established order machinery, professors, and favored icons diligently working to keep poetry castrated.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
CC: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Fahs lampooned in a new P. Maudit cartoon
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:52:02 -0500
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Saturday, November 1, 2014
Subject: Cornel West satirized in a new P. Maudit cartoon...
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:22:58 -0400
To Anita Cole, Executive Assistant to Cornel West,
Please pass on the attached cartoon on CW to CW. Also, please consider getting Union Theological Seminary to subscribe to The American Dissident (only $20/year). Thank you for your attention.
G. Tod Slone, PhD (universite de Nantes, FR) aka P. Maudit,
Founding Editor (1998)
The American Dissident, a 501c3 Nonprofit Journal of Literature, Democracy, and Dissidence
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:25:19 -0400
Subject: RE: Cornel West satirized in a new P. Maudit cartoon...
My name is Maria -- not Anita, and much like that mistake, your cartoon is further evidence that your ability to comprehend what you read and hear is quite limited. I won't be sending this on to Dr. West as I am personally insulted and will not spend anymore time on this.
> Maria Cole
> Assistant to Professor Cornel West
> Union Theological Seminary
> 3041 Broadway, AD 522
> New York, NY 10027
Subject: Fragile little egos...
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:45:35 -0400
Sorry for that little mistake. But how does one get so uptight over a simple error like that? Well, thanks much for the LOL! Cornel's little discourse was as clear as it gets. My cartoon riposte was as clear as it gets. Perhaps you, as hyper-uppity executive assistant, misunderstood his discourse and my response to it? Perhaps you should ask Cornel to help you out with that interesting term re-niggardization? Now, why does he need to buffer his fragile ego and mindset with a gatekeeper like you. That too seems like gross hypocrisy on his part. Now, how many poor people does he know who have their own personal gatekeepers? Hmm. :)
To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Satire and democracy!
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 19:04:33 -0400
To Benjamin Perry and Carolyn Klaasen, Body Caucus, Union Theological Seminary
What your institution needs is a DEMOCRACY CAUCUS, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH and VIGOROUS DEBATE would be praised and studied. You could begin with the attached cartoon I sketched on one of your instructors. Sadly, his executive assistant refuses to forward the cartoon to him. Perhaps you might do that? She obviously does not believe in VIGOROUS DEBATE, cornerstone of democracy. Do you? Or have you become PC-indoctrinated like her? If there is a student newspaper, please let me know. I couldn't find it on the website. Thanks for your attention.