A Forum for Vigorous Debate, Cornerstone of Democracy

***********************************************************************************************************************************
A FORUM FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND VIGOROUS DEBATE, CORNERSTONES OF DEMOCRACY
[For the journal--guidelines, focus, etc.--go to www.theamericandissident.org. If you have questions, please contact me at todslone@hotmail.com. Comments are NOT moderated (i.e., CENSORED)!]
Encouraged censorship and self-censorship seem to have become popular in America today. Those who censor others, not just self, tend to favor the term "moderate," as opposed to "censor" and "moderation" to "censorship." But that doesn't change what they do. They still act as Little Caesars or Big Brother protectors of the thin-skinned. Democracy, however, demands a tough populace, not so easily offended. On this blog, and to buck the trend of censorship, banning, and ostracizing, comments are NEVER "moderated." Rarely (almost NEVER) do the targets of these blog entries respond in an effort to defend themselves with cogent counter-argumentation. This blog is testimony to how little academics, poets, critics, newspaper editors, cartoonists, political hacks, cultural council apparatchiks, librarians et al appreciate VIGOROUS DEBATE, cornerstone of democracy. Clearly, far too many of them could likely prosper just fine in places like communist China and Cuba or Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Russia, not to mention Sweden, England, and Austria.
ISSUE #47 PUBLISHED MAY 2024. NOW SEEKING SUBMISSIONS FOR ISSUE #48.

More P. Maudit cartoons (and essays) at Global Free Press: http://www.globalfreepress.org

Monday, March 15, 2021

Doug Holder

The cartoon below was sketched in April 2005 and the poem written in 2014.  Doug Holder is still around and listed as a poet publicist for Harris Gardner's Boston National Poetry Month.  I began writing a critical poem last night after looking at Poets&Writers magazine and the Academy of American Poets website, both dross laden and thus excellent grist for creative writing.
...............................................................................................................


Notes on Artistic Sterility and the Academic Imprimatur
The dude* sent me an email announcement—a great 
self-congratulating pat on his back—, I was his bête noire.
Since he was on my list, I was now on his, though 
when I shotgunned, it was usually to announce
not the light of lime, but rather a good sledgehammering.
His press had teamed up with a regional college to
 promote 
the “literary arts” and the likely modus operandi
                                                of innocuous icon idolatry.

His vision of art seemed to be a castration of it, 
eliciting the approval of ladder-climbing pedagogues
—those chairs, deans, chancellors, VPs, and presidents—,
other members of the local chambers of commerce, 
and, of course, the proverbial old ladies in the audience.    

To be first in the series, as concrete illustration of the benefits 
of sucking up, kissing ass, and playing the literary game, 
he chose Boston Poet Laureate Sam Cornish, 
editor of children’s literature 
            and renowned author of An Apron 
Full of Beans.  

The dude’s purpose, besides pushing his own press, 
                        was to help students of creative writing
to garner not the courage to stand up and away from the herd, 
but rather to gain expertise in the fine art of literary networking.  
"This is a wonderful opportunity to be aligned
                                    with a rising academic institution,”
he declared, sounding more like a politician than a bard.  
"I want the literary community and the community at large 
to know about the vital literary programming at Endicott...”

Yet how could he proclaim “vital” the output of programmers 
who rarely, if ever, railed viscerally against the machine? 
“I am hoping to be involved in the creation of the Hub 
for the Arts on the North Shore,” he career-fully excogitated, 
when perhaps as a poet he should have instead 
                                                            truthfully excoriated.

Just what higher ed needed, I thought, a tad depressed 
by the persistence of poetry into the smiley-face verse factory 
                                    —another hub, yes, oh sadly, 
of artistic censors, blind-eye turners, PC and far too much civility.
................................................

*Doug Holder, publisher, Ibbetson Street Press, and Endicott College adjunct instructor


 

5 comments:

Unknown said...

back in the day Ibettsen had an open forum where you could make comments, argue whatever. then you became a poetry sales sight, where poets could proffer their books, but closed to the public.
d

G. Tod Slone said...

On target! Poetry has become a business, fully (or almost) coopted and castrated by the establishment, which includes Ibbetson Press.

Doug Holder said...

Thanks for remembering me...doug

Steve Glines said...

If poetry is a business it's based on a faulty profit model.

G. Tod Slone said...

Steve,
Thanks for commenting. Lots of poets (i.e., poets of the machine) make lots of cash via grants, academic tenure, invitation fees, book deals, awards, etc. Poets & Writers magazine editors likely make lots of cash. And don't forget Poetry Magazine's $200 million dollar Lilly drug money foundation! T